How Many Animals In The Original Wolf Creek Noah's Ark>

If anyone always claims the Bible is completely truthful and a book to be taken seriously, I'll point to the story of Noah'southward Ark. This story demolishes any claims Christians may accept that the Bible is truthful, that God is but or religion makes whatever sense. It is a ridiculous and preposterous tale that is almost too piece of cake to knock downwardly. But it shouldn't be. Christians aren't idiots they should recognise how fiddling sense the story makes and drop it. We shouldn't teach children this daft story based on the extermination of humanity. We shouldn't blindly accept the story, only instead question it and ask, how did all the animals fit on Noah'south Ark?

The story begins on a strange annotation that sets the scene. Apparantly the "Sons of God" married the "daughters of men" and as well "there were giants in the Earth in those days." I'thousand sorry simply no story involving people marrying giants or angels or whoever the sons of God are (isn't Christianity based on the belief that Jesus is the only son of God?) can peradventure be taken seriously. This apparently meant everyone on Globe was evil and doing wicked things (no caption was given of what these things were so we tin can only approximate). God decided that the only way to solve this vague problem was to kill every living thing on Earth! Talk most over reaction. Could he non simply accept given them a talking to? After all this was supposedly before the time of Moses and Abraham so God hadn't given whatsoever rules or commandments. Was genocide really the only solution?

It should exist obvious that not every single person on Earth was evil. Were the children and babies evil? Did they deserve to die? How can you look at an entire people and declare them all evil? Isn't that what Hitler did? He decided that all the Jews were evil and had to be exterminated. And then did God. Not merely that but all the animals who obviously weren't evil would also die. Surely he could have destroyed people in a less rough way then a alluvion? Surely information technology would exist less barbaric to simply convince people of the error of their ways than exterminate all life? Who idea this would be a good story for children?

God fabricated an exception and decided that Noah and his family unit would be spared if they congenital an Ark and took ii of every animal on lath. (This is complicated by the fact that the Bible contradicts itself and says that he brought seven of each clean animal and seven of each bird, forgetting that God hadn't notwithstanding distinguished between clean and unclean animals.) Now information technology should be obvious that are some problems with this story, namely that there isn't a gunkhole large enough to fit all the animals of the world on lath. First of all how did all these animals reach Noah's Ark? How did the penguins or the kangaroos (who tin't swim) arrive? Christians claim that all the animals came to Noah through some God given migration instinct. Simply how did they survive the journeying? Animals take specific diets, so if they moved location they probably would not have access to it and starve. Travelling the length of the globe is a journeying few animals could make, they simply don't have the endurance. They would accept to travel through foreign climates and expose themselves to diseases and animals that they had no defence mechanism against. Surely it's obvious to point out that having the entire animal kingdom converge on a unmarried spot is going to crusade lots of bug?

How did all the animals fit on lath? Scientists have named almost 2 meg species , merely all agree that this is just a tiny fraction of the true amount every bit there could exist between 5 and 30 meg species. Plain they couldn't all fit on the boat, especially when we know how big it actually was. How were the animals stored, after all many animals eat each other and therefore would accept to be kept split? What nearly the vast quantities of food that would take to be stored to feed them. What almost the carnivores who will only consume fresh meat? Some snakes only eat living animals, was in that location a stock of live mice on board equally food? What nigh herbivores who just eat plants, how was there food kept fresh for the unabridged year they were at sea? What was to forestall food from spoiling?  What almost cleaning up after the animals, how could just 8 people tend to thousands of animals when zoos have staffs of hundreds to deal with smaller numbers? What about ventilation and sunlight? Thousands of animals tightly packed into a confined infinite is a state of affairs rife for disease. Few animals are able to adjust to captivity even where it mimics their natural life. How could they survive in dark, cramped conditions? How were animals from incredibly cold climates stored together with animals from incredibly hot climates? If a single animal died, that entire specie would become extinct. If the margin of fault is zero, what happens if something goes wrong?

Christians attempt to get around this by challenge that insects were not brought on board (as most species are insects this greatly reduces the number). All the same, if they weren't on board then they would take drowned and nosotros wouldn't have whatever insects today. They claim that the animals were infants when they were brought on board, therefore taking up less infinite. Simply infants demand their parents to mind them and teach them how to survive. How else will they know what food to eat and how to avoid predators? Infants are too the virtually likely to catch disease and exist the victim of predators, so are non the all-time choice for the future of a species. Christians also argue that not every brute was on board but rather 1 from each family group. And then instead of the hundreds of different varieties of snakes, there was simply two snakes. In club to believe this you lot must believe evolution can occur in an extremely short space of time, only a few thousand years in this case. Evolutionary scientists know this is impossible which is why it is strange to hear creationists argue evolution didn't happen, except in this case.

Another pseudo-scientific argument is based on comparison how many sheep you can fit into a rail carriage. The author fails to realise that not all animals are sheep. Sheep are docile and do not fight even when in confined spaces. Most animals are not like this and will probably fight. The necessity of separating animals means y'all cannot squash them together. While you tin compact sheep for short journeys, you cannot keep them similar that for a year. Animals need to move around, have fresh air, and sunlight or they will die. A year of no movement, possibly in the dark, would leave them in a profoundly weakened state and prone to affliction.

There are diverse other problems. For instance, it is claimed that sea life would be fine as they would not be affected by a flood. This ignores the obvious fact that some fish live in fresh water and others alive in table salt h2o. A giant flood would upset this residuum and kill a cracking many of the fish. The rising sea level would besides significantly change marine life'south environment and cause great disturbance. Life that bases itself in shallow water would also probably be destroyed. What most leaner? Most bacteria cannot survive nether h2o so information technology must accept been on the ark. Too for disease, many of which require a man host. Noah and his family must have been riddled with disease.

Wooden boats are non that resilient and sunk quite easily past modernistic standards. What are the chances that a wooden boat built by a single family who may not take had whatsoever experience could survive the greatest flood in history? The Bible says that the flood covered fifty-fifty the highest mountain. If the Ark was higher than Mount Everest, then no one on board would be able to breath as the air is too thin. They would also freeze to death (ever wonder why there's likewise snow on pinnacle of mountains? It's extremely cold up there). Where did all the rain come from? The Bible says the window of Sky was opened, just what does that mean? After the flood where did the h2o become? Plenty water to encompass Mount Everest could inappreciably merely soak into the basis or evaporate. (There is also a scientific bespeak that that much water would completely mess up the atmosphere and make it incommunicable to breathe).

What happened after the flood? When the animals were released, how did they know where to go? How did they become from Mesopotamia to the Amazon? What did they consume because all the plant life would be dead subsequently a year nether water? What did the carnivores consume if killing a unmarried animal would cause that species to get extinct? How could anything grow if the entire Globe is covered in sediment? At that place would have been no fresh water anywhere on Earth so all life would have died. Scientists reckon that any species that contains less than 20 members will go extinct, so how did only ii animals in each species repopulate the Globe? Surely this would have required mass inbreeding that would genetically destroy a species? If Noah'due south family were the only humans left, did they accept to commit generation of incest to repopulate the Earth?

The best creationist response I could find was that the Earth was very different back then. They argue that in that location was only i continent and ane climate that immune easy migration. Or that animals had different features back and so, so sloths may have actually accept been fast at migrating (otherwise it would have taken generations for them to reach the Ark). Animals that have very specific diets at present could have had broader palates. There is a lot of preposterous nonsense like the merits that kangaroos could have already been living in Mesopotamia. There is a strong hint of desperation and clutching at straws.

At that place is 1 possible answer to this. God could have used magic. He could accept used magic to bring all the animals to the Ark, magic to make them fit on the Ark, magic to go along them live for the duration, magic to feed them and magic to help them repopulate the Earth. The problem is that if every single stride of the story requires magic, isn't it more likely that the story didn't happen? If he is going to use magic why build an Ark? Why non create a force field around what he wants to salvage and then impale the remainder, instead of waiting a year? Why non just requite all the evil people a center attack and save the trouble? If everything has to die, why not recreate it afresh?

The story ends with Noah sacrificing some animals to God (what was the signal of keeping them for a yr). God so decides that exterminating all humanity in the globe's greatest genocide isn't such a expert idea and promises non to do again. As a reminder he creates the rainbow. This might have made sense to whoever wrote the Bible, simply scientists know that rainbows come from the refraction of sunlight, if before the Flood, calorie-free didn't refract sight would exist impossible equally that is how we see.

And so there we have it. The most ridiculous and preposterous story that cannot possibly be taken seriously. It is a featherbrained story about genocide and mass extermination that for some reason some people still take seriously. Information technology didn't happen. The Bible is not true. If this story isn't true, and so there is a good chance a lot of the other stories aren't either. If God commits genocide he probably isn't a loving existence. It's fourth dimension to face up facts, Noah's Ark wasn't real.

If y'all want to see more creationists attempts (and failings) to explain the flood see Answers in Genesis and Cosmos.com. For the most detailed and through criticism of every aspect of the story of Noah's Ark see Problems With A Global Flood, while Atheism wikia is likewise good.

Source: https://whistlinginthewind.org/2013/02/03/how-did-all-the-animals-fit-on-noahs-ark/

Posted by: treadwellancyingums.blogspot.com

Share this post